Prominent Lawyer and UP Cum Laude to Duterte admin for Sereno’s ouster: "Calida’s Quo warranto, creative master stroke of lawyering” - Our Daily Revelations PH

728x90 AdSpace

Prominent Lawyer and UP Cum Laude to Duterte admin for Sereno’s ouster: "Calida’s Quo warranto, creative master stroke of lawyering”

Prominent Lawyer and UP Cum Laude to Duterte admin for Sereno’s ouster: "Calida’s Quo warranto, creative master stroke of lawyering” / Image credit to Facebook

Atty. Arturo De Castro, a prominent lawyer who’s graduated from the University of the Philippines as a Cum Laude congratulated Solicitor General Jose Calida whose efforts he referred to as a “creative master stroke of lawyering”.



Image credit to Facebook.com/thunderbee.gamefarm/posts/1768637296528835

With a long Facebook post that basically congratulates President Rodrigro Roa Duterte’s administration, Atty. De Castro gave the highest praise to Callida since his quo warranto petition saved quite possibly millions of government funds in ousting Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, this is in comparison to having her impeached through the Senate.

The lawyer also defended President Duterte after the Sereno claimed that the man was behind her ousting. De Castro made it clear that there is no concrete evidence to support her wild allegations. Also, Duterte is a lawyer and understands more than enought than to interfere with the Judiciary, he didnt even made a move to help the mayor of Cabadbaran City when the Supreme Court had issued an election recall,  considering the fact that he is one of Duterte’s most faithful supporter.



Lastly the lawyer also congratulated all the other men behind the victory versus the Chief Justice, men being, Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo, Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, and Atty. Perfecto Yasay Jr.

Image credit to Facebook.com/thunderbee.gamefarm/posts/1768637296528835
You can refer Atty. Arturo De Castro’s entire post below:

QUO WARRANTO OF MA. LOURDES SERENO

By:Dean ARTURO M. DE CASTRO



LL.B., cum laude, class salutatorian, UP College of Law ’70

LL.M., University of Michigan School of Law, ’76

S.J.D., University of Michigan School of Law ‘82


My congratulations to Solicitor General Jose Calida for winning the Quo Warranto petition in the Supreme Court that unseated Ma. Lourdes Sereno as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. It is a creative master stroke of lawyering that saves government from costs and expenses that would otherwise be incurred in the impeachment proceedings against former Chief Justice Sereno.

Should a motion for reconsideration be filed, the same would be an exercise in futility because the Supreme Court majority decision is based on solid constitutional and legal foundation. The requirements of honesty, integrity, and transparency under the constitutional provisions on Public Accountability as enforced and implemented under the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713) requiring submission of Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) are indispensable qualifications for appointment as Chief Justice, the post being in itself also a high public office. Under the Constitution, a public office is a public trust.

The submission of a declaration under oath of a public officer or employee’s assets, liabilities, and net worth not only upon assumption of office but also as may be required by law, is a mandatory requirement under Section 17, Article XI of the Constitution. The JBC rules requiring applicants for the Chief Justice post to submit their previous SALNs has the binding force of law. Any public official who fails to disclose his/her assets and net worth in the SALN is disqualified under the Constitution and the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees to be appointed Chief Justice for lack of proven integrity.



The claim of bias and prejudice on the part of the magistrates would not hold. The case was decided on the merit under the letter and spirit of the Constitution and the law. There is no grave abuse of discretion or error in judgment committed by the justices sought to be inhibited. There is no bias and partiality because the decision is based on the merit under the Constitution and the law. In any event, the case of Marbury v. Madison, in which Chief Justice Marshall wrote the court’s opinion although he was the Secretary of State who had acted on the papers subject of litigation, provides one of many cases that goes against Sereno’s bid to inhibit the Supreme Court Justices from the proceedings. The Supreme Court being the final arbiter in our system of government, it is fundamentally important that issues of national significance and consequence be determined, whenever possible, by the full Court.

Atty. Ma. Lourdes Sereno is barking up the wrong tree in accusing President Duterte in unseating her from the Supreme Court. There is absolutely nothing in the evidence to prove the accusation against the President.



The President, being a lawyer, is fully cognizant of the principle of separation of powers, and does not interfere to influence the decision making of the Supreme Court. This is manifested in the aborted mayoralty recall election in Cabadbaran City, Agusan del Norte. The COMELEC already issued a resolution for the recall election in Cabadbaran City, where Judy Amante—a candidate for mayor against incumbent mayor, Katrina Mortola—is supported by President Duterte, as is evident in the large billboards all over Cabadbaran City. President Duterte had no influence over the Supreme Court which, by a vote of 14 to 0, issued a Temporary Restraining Order enjoining the recall election for mayor in Cabadbaran City.

I salute the Supreme Court for protecting its integrity and dignity as an institution against the abusive and dictatorial person occupying the post of Chief Justice, who ignored the collective decisions of the Supreme Court En Banc, and instead imposed her own individual acts as acts of the Supreme Court as a collegial body, even without the approval of the Court En Banc.

The subsequent actions of Atty. Sereno affirms her disqualification to sit as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. She claimed bias against the six (6) justices who testified against her in the impeachment proceedings, without contesting the facts that these magistrates disclosed therein, and without pointing out what is wrong with the decision that should demonstrate that the decision on the merit was rendered unfairly and with partiality and prejudice against her.



Ma. Lourdes Sereno is not qualified to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. She does not have administrative talent to earn the respect of the other justices, and she failed the constitutional standards of honesty and integrity by failing to comply with the constitutional and statutory requirements for the submission of the SALN—for which the lowly court interpreter in Rabe v. Flores, Adm.Matter No. P-97-1247, May 14, 1997, and a former Chief Justice were dismissed from office.

One question in the psychiatric interview for the Chief Justice post is whether the applicant can work with peers as a collegial body. Her actuations after assumption of officer as Chief Justice demonstrate her incapacity to work with her peers as a team. Her acts of imposing her will on her peers in the Supreme Court and railroading and imposing her administrative decisions without approval of the En Banc constitute evidence of similar acts, scheme and habit, admissible in evidence on her lack of leadership and ability to work within a collegial body. Truly, it is difficult to function under a dictator.

I congratulate Solicitor General Jose Calida for his creative legal master stroke. The Duterte administration is blessed to have Solicitor General Calida, Presidential Legal Counsel Salvador Panelo, Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, and Atty. Perfecto Yasay Jr. as part of their legal team.











What can you say about this?

Share us your thoughts by simply leaving on the comment section below. For more news and viral updates, feel free to visit our site often. 

Thanks for dropping by and reading this post.













THIS BLOG asserts no credit for any pictures posted on this website unless generally noted. Pictures on this blog are copyright to its respectful owners. Photos utilized are for illustration purposes only. We don't claim the photographs and no copyright infringement is intended if there is a picture showing up on this blog has a place with you and does not wish for it appearance on this website, please email us with a connection to the said picture and it will be expeditiously brought down.

Prominent Lawyer and UP Cum Laude to Duterte admin for Sereno’s ouster: "Calida’s Quo warranto, creative master stroke of lawyering” Reviewed by Unknown on May 21, 2018 Rating: 5 Prominent Lawyer and UP Cum Laude to Duterte admin for Sereno’s ouster: "Calida’s Quo warranto, creative master stroke of lawyering” ...

No comments: